Wednesday, January 1, 2020

An Unrelatable Plot Does Not Make an Unrelatable Story

https://ift.tt/eA8V8J

I'm writing this in response to no post in particular

I've been watching a phenomenon unfold over the last few years where people who see unfamiliar settings or lifestyles onscreen are quick to brand the film as "unrelatable" and therefore unenjoyable or out of touch. In particular, this happened with La La Land, it happened with Crazy Rich Asians, and I'm seeing it happen with Booksmart now.

I want to say that it is important not to confuse a relatable story with a relatable plot.

Booksmart's plot is about a school of upperclass young teens jumping from bougie party to bougie party - its story is about insecurities and friendships and "enemies." It is a story about being careful not to push your own insecurities onto people you may think are your competitors, and realize that they may instead be struggling with the same insecurities as you are and are likely just as willing to be your ally and your friend. Regardless of your upbringing, these themes are, I think, relatable to many people.

La La Land is not a story about lost-in-the-clouds, upper-middle-class artists making it big in Hollywood - it is a story about how people who love each other may sometimes need to leave one another in order to be happy. It is a story about how chasing your dreams in one direction can sometimes close doors in others, but that doesn't mean there is only one path to happiness.

Crazy Rich Asians is not a story about lavishly rich indulgent Asians and their billion-dollar parties and weddings - it is about living up to expectations or finally becoming aware of how unreasonable they are, choosing to put your happiness and health before your family's, and how breaking tradition doesn't mean you don't respect your past. It is a representation of one of many 2nd generation immigrant stories through these particular eyes of an Asian-American.

Lion King for god's sake is about a lion claimant to the African wildlife throne - but everyone knows it's not really about lions, and frankly it's not even about kings. Who is out here saying they love Lion King because they can relate to living in exile for a decade with the crippling guilt of having their father's blood on their hands? Exactly: fuckin no one. Lion King is relatable and accessible because it is a story about confronting your past in order to be at peace with it, rather than running away from it.

This is what stories are. No matter how outlandish or barely recognizable its setting or characters or plot is, at their cores there are nuggets of truth and the human condition. Storytelling is humankind's oldest tradition for a reason, and I daresay that any and all movies, books, and songs are absolutely relatable to all people in one way or another. It's killing me to see movies be knocked down a peg because they're thought of as "unrelatable." In my opinion, there is no story or movie out there that is so outlandish or heartless as to be unrelatable. Unless it's Epic Movie.

If you can relate to Star Wars, if you can relate to Pride and Prejudice, if you can relate to Mad Max: Fury Road, if you can relate to Lord of the Rings, then you can easily, easily relate to Booksmart.

Thank you for coming to my TED Talk, remember to like and subscribe

submitted by /u/beautifur_panda
[link] [comments]

from Movie News and Discussion https://ift.tt/2F8ikSB
via IFTTT

Happy 2020: Server at Michigan restaurant gets $2,020 tip - The Associated Press

https://ift.tt/eA8V8JHappy 2020: Server at Michigan restaurant gets $2,020 tip  The Associated Press

from "source:AP" - Google News https://ift.tt/2u2PZe4
via IFTTT

Libya militias rake in millions in European migration funds: AP - Al Jazeera English

https://ift.tt/eA8V8JLibya militias rake in millions in European migration funds: AP  Al Jazeera English

from "source:AP" - Google News https://ift.tt/2rFflhg
via IFTTT

College football games today

Bowl Games

from Daily Search Trends https://ift.tt/310T8qA
via IFTTT

FSU football



from Daily Search Trends https://ift.tt/2oRgJs5
via IFTTT

Kim Says North Korea Not Bound to Test Freeze, Built New Weapon

https://ift.tt/2rJlr09

Kim Says North Korea Not Bound to Test Freeze, Built New Weapon(Bloomberg) -- Kim Jong Un declared that he was no longer bound by his pledge to freeze major weapons tests, saying the regime would soon debut a “new strategic weapon” and take “shocking” action toward the U.S.The North Korean leader told a gathering of party leaders in Pyongyang that the new weapon system had been “perfectly carried out” by scientists, designers and “workers in the field of the munitions industry,” the state-run Korean Central News Agency said Wednesday. The comments were released early New Year’s Day in North Korea, an occasion when Kim has previously made a televised address announcing big policy shifts.“The world will witness a new strategic weapon to be possessed by the DPRK in the near future,” KCNA said, citing Kim and referring to the country’s formal name.While showing his frustration for sputtering nuclear talks with the U.S., Kim still left an opening for President Donald Trump by not explicitly stating he would resume tests or break off the nuclear negotiations that have seen three face-to-face meeting since June 2018. Kim expressed his anger at joint U.S.-South Korean militarily drills, new U.S. weapons being deployed on the peninsula and sanctions, which have been choking North Korea’s paltry economy.Kim said the U.S. actions had forced him to reconsider a moratorium on tests of nuclear weapons and intercontinental ballistic missiles that could deliver them to the U.S. “He stressed that under such condition, there is no ground for us to get unilaterally bound to the commitment any longer,” KCNA said.“North Korea’s moratoriums are meant to be broken,” said Sung-yoon Lee, a professor of U.S.-East Asia relations at Tufts University’s Fletcher School. “North Korea always lays the blame for its actions on the U.S. Kim Jong Un, I believe is setting the stage for the next big provocation to come.”It was unclear whether Kim would also deliver a separate new year’s speech. Kim could replace his annual address with a policy statement from the plenary, the Seoul-based Yonhap News Agency reported before KCNA issued the report.In a previous New Year’s address, Kim said he planned to resume tests of ICBMs, but no mention was made of new testing in the latest report. Kim didn’t specify what the new strategic weapon was, or when it would be deployed.How Kim Jong Un Keeps Advancing His Nuclear Program: QuickTakeNorth Korea had expressed increasing frustration with the U.S. since Trump walked out of their last formal summit in February. Kim resumed launches of mostly short-range ballistic missiles at a record-setting pace and repeatedly warned that his freeze on tests on ICBMs might be coming to an end. Trump was not mentioned by name in the report, a sign that Kim has not resorted to the name-calling that punctuated their relationship ahead of their detente.“In the future, the more the U.S. stalls for time and hesitates in the settlement of the DPRK-U.S. relations, the more helpless it will find itself before the might of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea,” Kim told the four-day party gathering that ended Tuesday.‘Fell in Love’While Trump in 2018 claimed that North Korea was “no longer a nuclear threat” and that he and Kim “fell in love,” a deal between the two countries has remained elusive.Neither side can agree on the terms of disarmament or U.S.-imposed economic sanctions. Meanwhile, North Korea has continued to conduct missile tests and build its nuclear arsenal.North Korea had suggested a “Christmas gift” would be forthcoming after demanding additional concessions as part of the stalled nuclear talks. Earlier this year, Kim’s regime set a Dec. 31 deadline for a breakthrough. Trump has downplayed any threat, saying on Christmas Eve that the U.S. will “deal with it” and joking that Kim’s “gift” could be a “beautiful vase.”Robert O’Brien, Trump’s national security adviser, said in December that the U.S. will be ready to respond should Kim fire additional long-range missiles or conduct further nuclear weapons tests.“We’ll reserve judgment, but the United States will take action as we do in these situations,” O’Brien said on ABC’s “This Week.” “If Kim Jong Un takes that approach, we’ll be extraordinarily disappointed and we’ll demonstrate that disappointment.”Kim, however, had some ominous words for the U.S. “He said that we will never allow the impudent U.S. to abuse the DPRK-U.S. dialogue for meeting its sordid aim but will shift to a shocking actual action to make it pay for the pains sustained by our people so far and for the development so far restrained,” KCNA reported.\--With assistance from Shinhye Kang.To contact the reporters on this story: John Harney in Washington at jharney2@bloomberg.net;Jihye Lee in Seoul at jlee2352@bloomberg.netTo contact the editors responsible for this story: Brendan Scott at bscott66@bloomberg.net, Jon HerskovitzFor more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com©2020 Bloomberg L.P.




from Yahoo News - Latest News & Headlines https://ift.tt/2Fc0Vsk
via IFTTT

Donald Trump warns Iran it will pay 'big price' as protesters try to storm US embassy in Baghdad

https://ift.tt/2QxEtPz

Donald Trump warns Iran it will pay 'big price' as protesters try to storm US embassy in BaghdadDonald Trump accused Iran of orchestrating the attack on the US embassy in Baghdad as he said he expected Iraq to “use its forces” to intervene. "Iran will be held fully responsible for lives lost, or damage incurred, at any of our facilities. They will pay a very BIG PRICE! This is not a Warning, it is a Threat," he wrote on Twitter. "The US Embassy in Iraq is, & has been for hours, SAFE! Many of our great Warfighters, together with the most lethal military equipment in the world, was immediately rushed to the site," Mr Trump  intensified pressure on the Iraqi authorities who had been powerless to prevent hundreds of demonstrators breaching the outer wall of the embassy compound in the heavily fortified green zone. He pressed the case for action in a call to  Iraq's caretaker  Prime Minister Adel Abd al-Mahd, urging him to protect US personnel and property. Chanting "death to America", the protesters set fire to a sentry box, pulled security cameras away from walls and hurled a barrage of missiles including Molotov cocktails. At one point the mob, which was protesting against US airstrikes on an Iranian-backed militia in Iraq on Sunday, used a drainpipe in an attempt to smash an embassy window. US troops tried to disperse the crowd firing warning shots before using teargas and stun grenades.  At least 62 people were reported to have been injured. Iran killed an American contractor, wounding many. We strongly responded, and always will. Now Iran is orchestrating an attack on the U.S. Embassy in Iraq. They will be held fully responsible. In addition, we expect Iraq to use its forces to protect the Embassy, and so notified!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) 31 December 2019 Amid mounting tension, the US announced it would be deploying additional marines to increase security. Two Apache helicopters flew over the compound in a show of force. Matt Tueller, the US ambassador in Iraq, was not in the embassy at the time, but will be returning to join staff in the compound, the US State Department said. Under pressure from Mr Trump to protect US personnel, Mr Mahdi  had deployed special forces at the main gate in an attempt to prevent hundreds of protesters forcing their way in. Some of the crowd did withdraw, while others pitched tents, paving the way for a siege, which a spokesman for the militant group said would remain until US diplomats leave the country. As the violence unfolded in Iraq, Mr Trump intensified pressure on both Iraq and Iran with a series of tweets. "We expect Iraq to use its forces to protect the Embassy, and so notified!" Mr Trump tweeted, saying Iran "will be held fully responsible" for the unrest. Mr Trump was unapologetic for the military action which killed at least 25 fighters from Iran-backed Kataeb Hezbollah, a militant group with the US holds responsible for the death of an American contractor. "Iran killed an American contractor, wounding many. We strongly responded, and always will," the US president wrote. Supporters of Kataeb Hezbollah were prominent among the demonstrators in Baghdad, with the group's flags hanging on the fence surrounding the embassy. The Iraqi government, which is already facing a wave of protests across the country, has found itself caught in the crossfire between Tehran and Washington. Thousands of protesters and militia fighters outside the gate denounced U.S. air strikes in Iraq. Credit: AFP Mr Mahdi condemned the weekend's airstrikes, but Mr Trump remained unrepentant as he urged the country to stand up to Iran "To those many millions of people in Iraq who want freedom and who don't want to be dominated and controlled by Iran, this is your time!" the president tweeted. In response, Tehran accused the US of "audacity" in blaming Iran for the demonstrations. "The surprising audacity of American officials is so much that after killing at least 25... and violating the country's sovereignty and territorial integrity, that now... they attribute the Iraqi people's protest against their cruel acts to the Islamic Republic of Iran," said foreign ministry spokesman Abbas Mousavi. In the US, Republican hawks praised Mr Trump's tough response to the attack on the embassy. "He has put the world on notice - there will be no Benghazi's on his watch," tweeted Lindsey Graham, a close Trump ally and GOP senator from South Carolina. Newt Gingrich called for even tougher action. "The United States should respond to Iran in Iran. The Iranian dictatorship doesn't care how many of its allies we hit in Iraq. We have to go after the heart of the enemy and make them pay decisively."




from Yahoo News - Latest News & Headlines https://ift.tt/2QdxtID
via IFTTT

Cab Calloway -- Blues in the Night [Big Band]

https://ift.tt/2qQMLH2; submitted by /u/PaulClifford
[link] [comments]

from /r/Music https://ift.tt/2ZLxMNZ
via IFTTT

Picture of the day for January 1, 2020

https://ift.tt/39tPVEx
Picture of the day for January 1, 2020 submitted by /u/jcpag2010
[link] [comments]


from Media Analysis and Criticism https://ift.tt/2Qd7eSv
via IFTTT

Let's remember the epic video that brought us into this decade. From February 2010.

https://ift.tt/2QeEg4X
Let's remember the epic video that brought us into this decade. From February 2010. submitted by /u/phantasycrisis
[link] [comments]


from /r/videos https://ift.tt/2ZH05gH
via IFTTT

Study shows yoga may boost brain function

https://ift.tt/2QaZikK A review of 11 published studies found a link between yoga's movements, meditation and breathing practices and an increase in the size of key brain areas.

from Latest News - UPI.com https://ift.tt/39wm91K
via IFTTT

U.S. indexes end 2019 with gains; S&P and Nasdaq see largest growth since 2013

https://ift.tt/37rC67S The major U.S. stock indexes closed up slightly to end the year bolstered by positive news about the trade relationship between the United States and China.

from Latest News - UPI.com https://ift.tt/2F7YlmT
via IFTTT

Pompeo: US will hold Iran 'accountable' for any 'malign activity,' after Baghdad embassy attack

https://ift.tt/2ir1xxr of State Mike Pompeo reacted to the Tuesday attack on the U.S. embassy in Baghdad by suspected Iranian-backed militants, telling Fox News' Mike Emanuel that Tehran will always be held accountable for any "malign activity."

from FOX News https://ift.tt/2SHfQ5D
via IFTTT

Tuesday, December 31, 2019

Are low budget bad movies just money laundering schemes? The curious case...

https://ift.tt/eA8V8J

Several days ago, I made a thread asking about what happened to actress Anna Hutchison, who has been relegated to shitty low budget movies. You can find the thread here

So, I'm just using this as an example, but look at this trailer for one of the film's she's in called 'Murder at The Mansion' (2019) - it looks hilariously low budget:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExnnPApe1qk

This obscure low budget film has a 4.5/10 rating on IMDb with only 65 votes.

Now who produced this film? Stargazer Films USA, a premier independent entertainment company head quartered in Louisville, Kentucky. They're a division of Wyoming-based Stargazer Corp., a privately-held American mass media company.

They've produced FOUR of the five films she is in, all similarly low budget (Starting Up Love, Secrets at The Lake, Murder at The Mansion, Spitting Image) - https://stargazerfilmsusa.com/our-films/

Upon further examination of this company, four of the ''team'' have the last name O'Brien - https://stargazerfilmsusa.com/team/

Yes nepotism goes a long way, but it is a bit fishy.

Anyway, I am not trying to vilify the actors/actresses who choose to be in these films, nor am I making any hard accusations. What I've cited above is just one example of a shady production company, there's dozens more who produce these shady low budget movies. I'm just curious at the chances that these are money laundering schemes? I do wonder whether the actors/actresses are aware of whether they are. I've always had the inkling that they are such schemes.

submitted by /u/throwawaysgkwm
[link] [comments]

from Movie News and Discussion https://ift.tt/2MITKvH
via IFTTT

Share

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More