https://ift.tt/eA8V8J
Hey guys, I have a plan to start alternating between staying home and then 1-2 months somewhere else to really experience the place and surrounding at my own pace. I haven't started it yet, though.
I've always wanted to travel to Argentina, and I'll be on vacation in April, so I plan to get this thing started.
I've never been into cities and urban areas. I prefer nature, trekking and the outdoors. So I have three options, and I wanted opinions on which of these I could get the most out of in a month:
-
Bariloche: I've been reading about Bariloche for years, and it is a really incredible place with astounding nature. However, it still feels similar to where I'm from, the lakes, not-so-high mountains, the woods, etc. I wanted to go somewhere REALLY different from anywhere I've ever seen. On the other hand, it is the location I've read the most about from these.
-
El Calafate/Glaciares/Torres del Paine: Chile would get in the mix here. I'm not too familiar with the place and surroundings yet, but the landscapes and national parks seem to be exactly what I'm looking for. But I'm not THAT experienced in long trekkings and camping, so that worries me.
-
Ushuaia: What gets me about Tierra del Fuego is the literal fact that it is at the edge of the world. It seems so extreme and different. I love thinking about it. I'm just not sure if it's worth spending a whole month exploring and if the region is as awe-inspiring and gigantic as the previous option.
After writing this, I'm leaning more toward El Calafate, but I'd really love to hear your opinions and experiences!
[link] [comments]
from travel https://ift.tt/3HCsoSc
via IFTTT
